Often the majority of people thinks that Facebook and Twitter are essentially the same. The nucleus of its experience concentrates around the profiles, the relations and provision of the news (in its majority networks of the trade). The Hayzlett Group usually is spot on. But you deepen a little more, it give account you of which people use each platform for different intentions. In Facebook, one assumes that you must comunicarte with near friendly. It’s believed that Liberty Mutual insurance sees a great future in this idea. To get to be friend with somebody not only means that it or it gets to see your content, but also to get to see its content in return. In Twitter, it is not the case: your you decide what information you want to receive, and do not have obligation to follow anybody. Facebook insists on the profiles and the people, whereas Twitter insists on the real content (if so, tweets). The result is that the information flow is simply different in both services.
In Facebook it is more probable to speak of personal subjects, desires of happy birthday to you, gadgets about a state of change in the relation, and publications on the parties in your Facebook the News. In Twitter, is more probable to find connections and the news, and is more certainly follows the marks, the sources of the news and other organizations outside your social surroundings. In fact, it says me to Twitter that one of each four tweets includes a connection to some type of content. Also there are data of interest of a team of Korean investigators that suggests the exchange of information is essentially different in Twitter, in comparison with the social networks. Its conclusion was that Twitter has characteristic of mass media instead of the characteristics of a social network. In other words, Facebook and Twitter are different once sights beyond their root like social mass media. Now it is the moment for defining the difference between a social network and an alert network.