Then if it to find that you are being old and without tato, it goes to think that you are an old one with little adding it. If, on the other hand, you will be at an excellent moment of its life, and if to feel well therefore and for that you conquered it goes to be interested itself therefore. for that they think that Donald Trump has everything this, only remembers: it makes this although everything what it already is, and not for everything what it has. But he is clearly that I say to everything on boarding in the Book the Art of the Namoro, the Power of the Conquest and Seduction. Recently Darius Bikoff sought to clarify these questions. What To make If You Are Better With Computers Of what They You already must know that the masculine and feminine brain is different. The men have a dedicated area to the space perception, and are therefore that the ratio of men and women in the branch of engineering and computation so is unbalanced. If you are better with computers of what the women, this means only one thing: you are a man. The feminine brain has an advantage that it makes all difference: they obtain as the communication ability or improving the appearance then is probable that you discover that its result is not improving nothing. Why? Because of an important called quality coherence, action (including the language corporal), words, and social identity (that is, everything what the other people speak of you) simultaneously. For example, its plan can include academy, learn the Technique of Alexander, make new friends and learn some jokes to count during a colloquy. Another secret importantssimo to become irresistible the women is to learn to create chemical and sexual tension between vocs. We will speak tomorrow on this. By the way, I teach to mine techniques to you to seduce Models in the Book the Art of the Namoro, the Power of the Conquest and Seduction! He enters here: Tomorrow you go to discover: Day 6: How to create chemistry and sexual tension? Good luck!
Reflection on the beddings of the Psicopedagogia. The first sight the term suggests to be about an application of psychology to the pedagogia, however its definition does not reflect to the meaning that this term assumes in reason of its birth. In this direction while production of scientific knowledge, the psicopedagogia that was born of the necessity of improves the understanding of the process of the learning. The learning problems another one would not be a mere application of one, but yes as organization of a new area, appealing to the knowledge and thinking about its object of study. How much to the sprouting of the psicopedagogia when mentioning the attempts of explanation for the failure pertaining to school for other ways that not pedagogical and psychological it, the used inquiry to explain alarming indices of the failure pertaining to school involve exclusively individual factors as: malnutrition, neurological, psychological and social. The psicopedagogia cannot be thought simply as an application as an application of psychology to the pedagogia. The object of central study is structuralized around the learning process human being, its evolutivos and pathological standards (symptoms). It studies the act to learn to teach taking in account the internal and external reality of the learning, looking for to study the construction of the knowledge with equality to the cognitivo, affective and social aspect in the society, not restricting the school, but also the family and the community. Initially it was a subsidiary action of the medicine and psychology when assuming as independent and complementary knowledge, of an object of study in the learning process. In the preventive work we can speak in different levels of prevention, the First level psicopedagogo acts in the educative process (problems in the learning); as the level the objective is to diminish and to deal with the problems of installed learning already; the Third level the objective is to eliminate the upheavals already installed in clinical procedure with all its applications. To if coming across with new theory concerning alfabetizao, psicopedagogo, together with other professionals of the school elaborates compatible methods of education with the new conceptions of the process. She is necessary that psicopedagogo knows what is to teach and what is to learn, as to intervene the system and educative method; the structural problems intervined in the sprouting of the upheaval of the learning in the pertaining to school process. In the clinical work we must conceive the citizen that learns as a epistmico citizen (with limits of the knowledge), implying disgnostic procedures and therapeutical, that consider conception of the diagnosis of as the citizen learns and the desire to know. The pedagogia and the psicopedagogia, are not enough to apprehend the study of the object, because the psicopedagogia bring the indefinies and contradictions of a science whose limits are of the proper life human being, the process of learning and its 0 variable supporting practical its, appealing to other areas as the philosophy, neurology, sociology, the linguistics and psychoanalysis.